Find a Lawyer

NAVEEDUDDIN KHOKHAR versus NISAR AHMAD MAHESAR

Section 401 (2) Prison Rules, 1978, Rr 140 (1), 216 and 217 (2) Release of convicted offenders under head or guards, Grant, non-payment of compensation to subordinate legal representatives, seeking permission for trial The failing court officials did not cite the apology / apology or release of the accused for more than 18 years, but the accused apologized and released the accused to the accused's legal representatives. The amount was not paid and the injured complainant's duty was to be accounted for by the responsible persons before the release of the accused. Hey, notify the trial court but this was not done and the accused were released immediately, which led to the legal representation of the accused and the injured complainant. The injustice with them ignored the authorities that not only the appeal but also the accused persons are pending before the High Court. The petitioner's case against the accused for extending the death sentence to life imprisonment is also under investigation. There was a delay. The accused were sentenced to 6 years and 3 months imprisonment and received pardon for more than 18 years. Such waiver was illegal and the accused were sent to jail for sentencing. family advocate from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer