Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ ANWAR versus HABIB BANK LTD

In order to recover the sums of Sections 9, 10 and 22, the Plaintiff's Bank allowed the defendant and the plaintiff to execute the financing agreement on the basis of markup as a convenience of return finance, under which it established installments. I agreed to return the said amount and the bank purchased the car. The defendant made some payments to the defendant, but then failed to pay the installments in accordance with the terms of the contract despite numerous demands and notices from the bank and the bank, and filed a lawsuit against the accused and The vehicle was recovered after the banking court pronounced the judgment. The defendant filed an appeal against the judgment and decree of the Banking Court, the tank accelerated the vehicle in question and the bank officers used the same bank illegally, to claim the money in respect of the vehicle. Finance was provided for, the vehicle had to be towed back. In accordance with the Defendant and the law and adjusting the sale process after disposing of the said vehicle or after, there is no claim for shortfall bank that was not in a position to speed up the vehicle. Cannot be returned or adjusted for the value of illegal vehicles by its staff. On the contrary, the plaintiff could not maintain proceedings against the bank, the defendant had to pay damages for his wrongful and unlawful actions, but since the defendant did not file a retaliation claim, he was not allowed. Could be done. famous supreme court advocate from Chunian lawyer