ABDUL WAHID versus THE GENERAL MANAGER
4, 6 and 7 Punjab Services; Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Recovery of stolen medicines from the authorized officer of the store on the basis of inquiry committee report. Charges of theft, major fines were recommended, but service tribunals charged with receiving stolen drug payable for up to one-third of their salary from authority staff salaries filed by a government employee The appeal made is that the sentence of justification is not such a punishment nor is it a crime of a public servant. The Independent Inquiry Committee was found to be fully involved in the preparation of the drugs, the inquiry was performed by giving the public servant the full opportunity to present his case and to examine the authority of the witnesses. Repeating its illegal activities in payment of fines. Even the ordinary man of modesty will not maintain such a ban. By appearing for theft after being involved in theft, the government has shown flexibility by the government to pay such fine as public property guardian. No, the Supreme Court dismissed the application and refused to appeal the authority as directed. Dismiss a civil servant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Charsada lawyer