Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus SESSIONS JUDGE, ATTOCK

Article 4 544 An Explosive Code (XLV of 1860), Article 324 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The person injured was disputed The dispute was when the accused had given sufficient punishment and in return for simple imprisonment. Was sentenced. Fines and Compensation, That Person Was Not Responsible for Payment of Compensation to the Injured Person There was no merit to the dispute and compensation received by the court under Section 4444 AA may be recovered, even if the PC. They could neither be written nor waived, significant penalties were required. Section 4444A A, CCPC's terms were mandatory even if the accused had gone through prison for the payment of compensation, Even then the amount of compensation will be recovered as the appeal for the residual amount of land revenue was allowed, according to which the Supreme Court denied the accused. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kohistan lawyer