Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus SESSIONS JUDGE, ATTOCK


Article 4 544 An Explosive Code (XLV of 1860), Article 324 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The person injured was disputed The dispute was when the accused had given sufficient punishment and in return for simple imprisonment. Was sentenced. Fines and Compensation, That Person Was Not Responsible for Payment of Compensation to the Injured Person There was no merit to the dispute and compensation received by the court under Section 4444 AA may be recovered, even if the PC. They could neither be written nor waived, significant penalties were required. Section 4444A A, CCPC's terms were mandatory even if the accused had gone through prison for the payment of compensation, Even then the amount of compensation will be recovered as the appeal for the residual amount of land revenue was allowed, according to which the Supreme Court denied the accused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Chashma lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.