SH. SAJID MAHMOOD versus FAZAL AHMED
Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff's application for a case had either the equality of ownership in the property or the appellate court having the highest entitlement to the vendor suit issued by the trial court. It was maintained. , But in the review by the High Court, the deposed plaintiff recognized the equitable right of ownership of some of the defendants' property. The remaining suspects were found to have committed suicide attacks by vendors. The courts below excluded the evidence of a witness who explicitly stated that after reading evidence of such testimony with the Pedri table, the Wenders were high court suicide attacks, dismissing the case for appropriate and reasonable reasons. Was granted, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition and refused leave.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Liaquat Pur lawyer