Find a Lawyer

DR. IFTIKHAR AHMAD ZAHID versus MRS. NILOFER AKHTAR

The plaintiff accepted the claim of the plaintiff by way of an extension of the case for the specific contract of sale of section 12 civil procedure code (v. 1908), section 148 constitution of Pakistan (1973), article 185 (3). The trial court is an order directing the plaintiff to collect the balance sale price within thirty days, otherwise it will be dismissed before the expiry of the trial before the expiry of the trial, whose order is higher. The plaintiff of the court had argued. The defendant has accepted his claim in accordance with the specific performance decree, there is no benefit in not extending the time to accrue the balance sale price. That the trial court did not deny the authority to extend its term. That there were conflicting views on the question of jurisdiction of the court after the decree was passed in the matter of extension of the term by the decree, and in this case apart from Shah Wali v Ghulam Din (PLD 1966 SC 983), the Supreme Court There was no definitive verdict, which came out of the ruling in the pre-arrest case, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal to consider such a question in light of the relevant law. pakistani advocates Shahkot lawyer