Find a Lawyer

SHARIF versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Additional land was allotted through section 2 (2) homeless persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), sections 11 and 14A (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3), 189 and 199 remand order applications. Was. In 1969, information on the muck was canceled and a month later the constitutional application filed against the cancellation of the additional land was dismissed by the High Court, but the Supreme Court observed that the appeal was dismissed for leave. Veterans should contact settlement authorities for reconsideration. In their case, in order to allow them to retain more land on payment of market value, the applicants applied for an allotment of additional land on which the Assistant Commissioner sold such land to them as a notified officer. Such an order was challenged by the constitutional petition, which was accepted whether the order was a remand order by the Supreme Court under section 2 (2) of the Evuke Property Act, repealing the Law of the Displaced Persons (1975), As such, the High Court had no jurisdiction to revoke the order of the Assistant Commissioner, who has There was a legal option to sell the land, the Supreme Court did not set the order of the High Court in the first decision, which was the action against the applicants who confirmed the cancellation of the land in excess of their names. The settlement of the complaint was not forwarded to the settlement authorities, except the observation that their request should be considered sympathetically. Legal rights applicants cannot be sympathetic in their favor as there is no time for transfer in their favor. best law firms from Hala lawyer