Find a Lawyer

AKHLAQ AHMED versus THE STATE

Article 99 / / 2020 / / 6868 / / 7171 ??? Appreciation of evidence All the prosecution's witnesses were subjected to cross-examination for a long time, but nothing could be obtained because their statements contradicted the material points. And there was no contradiction in their statements. Failure to identify any contradiction in the statements of the prosecution witnesses, which may raise doubts about the prosecution's case. The allegation that the alleged money was levied was withdrawn because such a large sum could not be charged, if not recovered. There was reason to dismiss the accused as an alternative to the other accused, the accused had failed to identify any of the accused by the prosecution's witnesses, if they had committed a crime, the prosecutor had completely dismissed the case. Was established, based on the decision of the trial case. The trial court did not commit any illegal proceedings by the W.W. The accused prosecution stood on its feet in the trial and the accused failed to show any reason for interfering with the trial court's decision, not competent at trial. Appeals against being dropped were dismissed. immigration advocates from Padidan lawyer