Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYYUB versus THE STATE

Section 9 and 18 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition referring to the accused on charges of corruption and corruption, was a case of litigation regarding references filed in the Accountability Court with the accused (alleged manufacturer). The co-accused produced false reports. The impact was that the suspect had installed machinery in his factory and said that the unit had facilities at home that could manufacture special precision shafting of iron and alloy steel and based on this, a false report factory. Dardar was extended the facility of Section R510 (1) 91 on 30th 1991, thereby availing huge sums of money, which suffered the same disadvantages to the public chequer collector, who is also an accused in this case. Was asked to provide a list of machinery installed in the factory premises which was administered. Sending a list of certified machinery by the accused officers committee, based on the above list confirmed that the Tory / Company has facility for manufacture of iron and alloy steel / collector customs precision shafting in the above report. Sure enough, another confirmation report was sent confirming the claim of the factory / company suspect / owner in which 31 machines were properly installed. In its premises, the Central Board of Revenue has, in view of these reports, allowed to import 10,000 metric tons of square bills under the deduction of duty tax under section RO 510 (1) 91, 30 199 1991. Issued a certificate to the company and the company / factory said that it continued to take advantage of Section RO and imported the raw material without payment of duty. tax advocates from Thul lawyer