Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus THE STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149 Guarantees, daytime offers and the two parties are fully acquainted with each other, identifying the complainant and witnesses for the alleged behavior and conduct. There was no doubt about it. The Commission of Crime had indicated that this was a default and pre-joint violent attack on the complaining party, as well as the version and statements of three other injured witnesses, including the complainant, also supported the prosecution's version, from the number of attackers. The number of injuries received is not only the complainant, but all other witnesses also supported the prosecution's story. After recording the statements of the defense witnesses, the trial court had to weigh and weigh the accused persons as the ultimate power to decide the crime or innocence of the accused with the trial court, the father of the three killed by his son complainant. Cannot afford to pardon the real killers and witnesses do not have the motive to wrongly engage in the case. The statements of the witnesses of the defense were not enough to deny the allegations against the accused persons. The opinion of the police regarding the accused's innocence cannot be considered as legal evidence. In this case, the High Court has to agree with the police and guarantee the accused. There was sufficient authority to deny that the challan case in column number 2 would remain as an indictment for that purpose until it was dismissed from court, even if the police opinion should be accepted. Whether or not, the facts and circumstances in this case will be considered as attendance. Was molested top advocates from Chakwal lawyer