MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ versus THE STATE
The prosecution did not have sufficient evidence to link the defendants to the Criminal Procedure of Section 497 (2), the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the Section 302/34/109 Guarantee, Further Investigation, as no motivating charge against the accused. Was not imposed. The accused and his name were not included in the FIR. Police did not believe in the active participation of the accused involved in the crime, in which the accused was involved. After the record was allegedly panchayat was evidence of a faulty type case against the accused further inquiry, he was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer
