Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ

Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O VII, R 11 After the dismissal of the suit land suit, the plaintiff's interest in the defendant's interest in the plaintiff's interest was through the sale deed registered in 1947 and by the vendor. Had received. After the death of the lawsuit, his legal heirs / defendants sued the land because his owners could not apply for an extension in his favor in his life on the basis of a registered sale deed. On and on the plaintiff has a legacy. The deceased vendor approved the defamation in his favor in 1990, on the basis of which the sales dead collector canceled the defamation, the plaintiff's plaintiff / legal heritage filed a lawsuit for declaration. Was granted and the trial court dismissed the plaintiff on the order of trial. Appeal Court's Appeal Court confirmed the deceased seller's heirs had the suit land, no time limit was set for the registration and confirmation of the cell mutation on the basis of a registered cell deed when any When the sale deed was submitted to the Registration Authority, it was the duty of the Registration Authority to automatically send the Registry Registry to the concerned Revenue Authorities concerned for registration and verification of mutation on the power of registered cell deed. Is also very intact because the defendants did not take any legal action to cancel the sale. The proceedings were never even time-bound in the possession of the party and the suit filed by the defendants was not time-bound and on the basis of which the plaintiff's decision could not be dismissed. jobs for advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer