Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QAYYUM versus RAEES WAZIR AHMAD

Accepting the nomination papers for Sections 14 and 99, the opposition candidate has filed an appeal against the approval of the nomination papers, stating that he has not filed his declaration of assets and liabilities in accordance with the law. He was not present before the Returning Officer at the time of filing or scrutinizing the papers, and that the papers were sent by the nominee to the respondents - a manner which was not recognized by law by the FAX from abroad. , Grounds were not requested by Appellant to reject the papers nomination. Earlier, no oral objection was raised by the appellant by filing a written objection to the Returning Officer, though the parties' nominations were accepted on the same day, in the absence of any objection by the appellant before the Returning Officer. , The appellate court cannot make inquiries. The reason for the grounds appealed by the appellant is that because the appellate court representative in the summary proceedings could consider the qualifications and disqualifications of the candidate involved under Section 99 of the Representation Act, 1976, the respondent submitted that he had submitted his proposal. Was given the option of submitting nomination papers on his behalf and he was properly. In response to the Returning Officer, the appellant's objection that the respondent's papers were received by nomination fax and not submitted by the proposer could not be accepted because to confirm. No material was recorded that the returning officer received the nomination papers by fax and was not signed best law firm from Satyana Bangla lawyer