Find a Lawyer

MEHR MUHAMMAD YUSUF versus THE STATE

Sessions Judge's Articles 22A (6), 435 and 439 Directive filed by Ditto's brother to file a criminal case against a police officer went to offer. And said that the police officer kept the complainant's brother in illegal jail, where he was subjected to severe torture and the police officer received Rs 34,000 from him to release his brother session judge. The allegations made against the police officer and other persons in the inquiry against the police officer who requested the police to stop him on the complaint of KK's brother proved to be valid, apart from the session judge, recommended department action, through anti-corruption department. Order to receive Rs. 34,000 for registration of criminal case against accused police officer As a consolation, which was recovered from the suspects during the inquiry, the accused was challenged by the police officer claiming that under Section 22A, the CCS had directed the judge to register a case against him. , The provisions of Section 22A Subsection (6), were clearly provided to the Sessions Judge by the CRPC in proceedings. As the `Justice of the Peace case 'was capable of issuing a proper direction for registration of the case, the provisions of the Anti-Corruption Rules were merely in nature and no violation was sufficient to end the FIR. Or reverses the accusation if any action is void. Otherwise, the facts and circumstances of the case against the accused had to suffer, the purpose of the registration of the case was to decide the criminal proceedings. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chak 46 lawyer