MST. REHMAT BIBI versus NOOR MUHAMMAD
Section 5050 && 1 561 A Superintendent Cushing F-Order, section HO of the relevant police station, seized the tractor / trolley under Section 5050, CRPC, on which section HA loaded two lathe machines. It was suspected that the lathe machines were a stolen property. Both the petitions or the submission of lathe machines were rejected by the magistrate against which only the defendant filed a review which was accepted and said that the property in Superdie was given to the person from whom under section 505050 The police seized the alleged property, CRPC had said not only before the police, but also before the magistrate that he had sold the said property to the respondents, in order to disclose any documents to the applicant. Was unsuccessful. No amendment or civil lawsuit has been filed to bring this property into custody nor initiate any proceedings. Legal action against the person who said that the property has been sold to the respondent's revised court, I, he has rightly handed over the property to the respondents that it was approved by the court based on a reasonable basis, cannot be interfered with nor can it be terminated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Kotri lawyer