Find a Lawyer

MST. REHMAT BIBI versus NOOR MUHAMMAD

Claims to own the suit and land for the declaration of title of section 8 and 9 Civil Code of Conduct (V 1908), claiming to own the land with the special khasra numbers and alleged that he was sued. He was expelled during the hearing. Under the trial, no local commission was appointed at the trial, nor a lawsuit was filed, nor was such an appointment sought by the plaintiff to file a lawsuit. , Under which the lawsuit was filed. Defendants' Defendants Defendants Defendants Under this Title in Defamation Claims, in Defendants' Defendants Containing Relative Numbers, To Defend Plaintiff's Claims to Occupy Defendants' Occupied Land Not enough, there is nothing in the record to show that in the absence. The defendants were comprised of special measles numbers, there was no basis for passing the decree, the objection stated that it was for the plaintiff to claim that the incident in the tribal possession contained certain measles numbers. And was forced to sack so that the plaintiff failed to succeed in this case. To do so, it is not claimed that the plaintiffs have sued the plaintiff in connection with their suit in connection with the suit land, the following courts have filed a material illegal action through a claim filed by the plaintiff's decision. And the following court orders were upheld by the High Court. Removed by claimant female advocates from Panjgur lawyer