Section 417 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 Appeal against the charge of breach of the accused was that 2kg of opium was recovered on his personal search, giving the accused the benefit of it. He was acquitted. All four prosecution witnesses were investigated in this case. The police officer was able to rely on the police officer as much as any other witness was not in the record to make his testimony suspect. A case was registered against the accused at the behest of. The police and the fact that the alleged opium was recovered from the house of a person other than the accused was sufficient to create serious doubts on the whole matter of the prosecution. The accused was acquitted after a regular trial and he was acquitted. If there was a double benefit of guilt, the heavy responsibility was on the prosecution to deny that there was a possibility of innocence, but the accused, who failed to file an appeal against the prosecution, was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
