Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD EHSAN versus THE STATE

Article 9 409/686868/3434 Definition of Evidence Defendant was convicted and sentenced by the trial court despite the fact that the oral evidence presented by the prosecutor could not in any way implicate the accused and Documentary evidence attached to the prosecution has never been proven. The legal requirements that the witnesses present in support of the prosecution's case made general statements to the accused without making any positive allegations, and some of the prosecution's witnesses turned the esteemed trial court but primarily the municipal committee. Based on the report of the investigation conducted by the Chief Officer of the. He said that the witness had never entered the witness box and was not released by the prosecution as was not legally proven by the required witness in accordance with the law, during the trial the inquiry officer All the witnesses who testified earlier refused to support the case. In view of the prosecution and its success, it was termed ad hoc trial court. The fact is, the Chief Officer's reliance on such a report as a whole and in the main reason his prosecution was reasonably doubtful. , Should fail to prove his case against the defendants beyond punishment and convictions. Recorded and set aside by the trial court against the accused and acquitted of the charges immigration advocate from Gadoon Amazai lawyer