Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR


Plaintiff's title to section suit42 suit land is not equal to the plaintiff's contention in the disputed land that Plaintiff had built a home on this property more than his title, based on record of the defendant's possession. Have proved their ownership over this land. In the disputed area by the plaintiff, no other record was presented near the plaintiff except that it was related to a different number of issues besides the defamation. Was rejected by The record of the evidence shows that the land in the possession of the defendant was in accordance with his ownership of the effect and the decision was in accordance with the evidence of the record passed by the appellate court, with the judgment and decree of the CPC, the High Court There was no basis for intervention by. By the appellate court

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.