Find a Lawyer

HAKIM ALI versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Revenue authorities obtained from the approval of the civil court orders through a civil court order regarding the suit land subject to section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 172. Was not presented to show that the suit occupied the land at the time of the defendants' death. The original allottee testified to the fact that after examining the Revenue Record Order approved by the Collector, the appeal was retained in the plaintiffs instead of wasting the search of Revenue Authorities before the Board of Revenue, a civil lawsuit was filed. And the trial court ordered the appellate court to set aside the trial court's ruling and ruling, and the lawsuit was dismissed and dismissed. Revenue authority was against the record, therefore, when the trial court issued a decree, the suit failed to read evidence that reflected material irregularities and the appellate court-approved plaintiff's case by the appellate court. The right to be excluded was unlawful, neither illegal nor denied, nor did the evidence refuse to interfere with the order passed by the High Court. By the appellate court inheritance advocates near Mastoi lawyer