Find a Lawyer

KHUDA BAKHSH versus MAULA BAKHSH

Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) A. Hashtam, R7 Relief, Claimant Molding of the Contributor Claims to Owner of the Suit Property The decision was granted in favor of the suit plaintiffs' decision and the order passed by the trial court The name was The appellate court set aside on the ground that the plaintiffs in their case had relieved that they were the exclusive owners of the suit property, while the two courts together also found that the property was jointly owned by both parties. Owned. The evidence on record was not supported by the defendant or the manner in which the defendant was rescued, however, as such a court could not be knocked down, the appellate court had the authority to make its own finding. Adjust relief accordingly. The plaintiff failed to exercise its jurisdiction as a co-owner of the property appellate court and an order was issued based on his own reading of the evidence on the record, failing to record the appropriate, judgment, and consequently, The High Court declared the plaintiff to be the co-owner of the suit property and directed the parties to maintain the status quo till the division of the property. solicitors from Khangarh lawyer