Find a Lawyer

MAULANA MAQSOOD ANWAR versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF

Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Constitutional Substance Abuse of Dedicated Property Locus Standi was located in the city center to challenge such action, and officials of the Department of Corruption also used it on their own. What was In the constitutional petition, the High Court approved the constitutional petition and the authorities' order was granted, and the application submitted in the infra-court appeal was rejected. It was through the authorities that the petitioner filed the petition. The Lux Standby was not available for. Representatives from the area and the land came into the circle who also claimed ties to the original dedicated family because in such cases the applicant was affiliated with the Lux Standage, where workers were dedicated to the protection and protection of property. Who was deposed and himself involved. For the purpose of illegally abusing such property, citizens had a right and duty to challenge such misconduct, to educate Muslims underground and give them Islamic instructions. Was devoted to providing, therefore, every Muslim was the beneficiary of the dedication and associated with the Lux Standi. Submit an application where the property dedicated to violating the powers of the High Court dedicated to the jurisdiction under section 3 of the Law Reform Ordinance was being abused or used, refusing to interfere with the decision passed in the Constitution, Infra-Court Appeal dismissed patent advocate from Laliah lawyer