Find a Lawyer

ANWAR JAN GILL versus THE STATE

Articles 17 and 22 Definition of Proof Both independent witnesses were real brothers, but their only connection with the witnesses was no reason to exclude their evidence. There was no prior background of enmity between the parties and neither. The two suspects were not likely to be falsely involved. The prosecution's witnesses supported the litigation until the trial. There was no contradiction between the statements of the two prosecution witnesses, the defendant's statement on the oath did not proceed with the case, evidence of the defendant's defense was not enforceable in the eyes of the law, and the suspected cause before the trial court, the prosecution case. Was not harmed in any way, the court had to look at the intrinsic value of the witness statements and if the court is satisfied that the evidence came from unreliable sources, then there is no need for a certified prosecution. The trial court's appeal against the accused was proved, the appeal against the trial court's decision to convict the accused was unsealed. best advocate from Daska lawyer