Find a Lawyer

QAMAR EHSAN versus THE STATE

The accused accused of defining Section 302 (b) evidence was immediately named in the FIR, and the prosecution's witnesses had no previous rivalry with the accused for his false allegations or alternatives. The complainant was presented by both. Full evidence from the medical evidence and the recovery of the pistol took place inside the accused's shop and it was told how the incident happened. The accused did not inspect any witnesses in support of his request that the victim be his Came to The shooting from the pistol prosecution case, in the circumstances, was completely established against the suspects beyond any doubt, the trial court could not intervene to prove the crime registered by the trial court, did not repeat the fire. And the complainant's case was that he also tried prosecution. Interfering When the accused was acquitted, nothing was brought on the record. The matter that occurred between the victim and the accused before the incident took place; in those cases, there was no death sentence; The trial court had sentenced the accused to death, which led to the high court's sentence of life imprisonment. jobs for fresh advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer