Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFI versus THE STATE

Before the arrest of Section 498 Explosive Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (iii) / 34 of the arrest, one of the certified accused accused the complainant of blowing a fist and was reportedly on such a blow. As a result of fracture of her nose bone. Complainant under Section 7337A (iii), FIR statement on delay of PPC was on record No arrest warrant against the accused was not pre-arrest. The accused was dismissed while the remaining two accused were also named The complainant was hit with a fist, but other than an injury, which was attributed to someone other than the accused, no medical injury was found on the complainant's body, The dispute was found in the FIR statement and medical evidence said that the accused had been referred to the accused for injury to the complainant's nose. The question related to the alleged liability will be seen at trial. Further investigations into his crime were expected and included under section (2) of section 497, CCPCID said that the accused had joined the investigation with confession, before his arrest warrant. Has been approved. list of advocates from Jacobabad lawyer