The testimony of Section 2 (2 (b)) was presented in this case by two witnesses, one of whom was the son of the deceased and the other was his nephew who happened to be in a very populated area, but the prosecution had filed a case. The accused was the father of three co-accused and one of them was killed in a police encounter. The unidentified suspect was never arrested by the police and only Lalkar was lying with the present accused. The possibility of execution was told, which was the father of three co-accused, could not be denied, giving the accused the benefit of the doubt, the trial. He was sentenced and sentenced by a court hearing, which was set aside and ordered to be released.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
