Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR ALIAS BHOLA versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 4 394 / evidence 34 Definition of evidence No one was named in the FIR and only the accused persons were described. It happened in the dark of night and the accused was sentenced to two years. And four months after the identification parade took place, the accused's identity was not possible even two months after the arrest of the parade, in the circumstances, even after such a long time had passed, the prosecution's witnesses said The role of the accused was not stated in the incident which they played during the recovery of the incident. Criminal weapons such as theft were implicated and it is said that the chemical executor and serologist reported that the human blood was stained, which was highly unnatural and impossible after such a long period of time. The second weapon was not recovered. An eyewitness to the prosecution was not mentioned in the FIR as the witness and PK's most important and star witness was the rapist, the driver of the wagon that was not presented and a And the person who was mentioned as an eyewitness was also not presented, according to a defense witness who was a jail warden. Alt in the air and said that he was in prison in connection with another of the accused. In the present case, if any of the prosecutors had already been jailed during the course of the investigation, what is the guarantee that the two other suspects could not be wrongly involved by the police, the accused. One was acquitted by the trial court and not. Appeal was filed either by the complainant or by the state evidence that did not come from an ineligible source immigration advocates email from Mubarik Pur lawyer