Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR YASIN versus ABDUR RASHID KHAN

Comparison of the signature of Articles 84 of the Law of Art and Ar and of the Pro-84 document of proof of proof of the document was a plausible justification by which it was in the jurisdiction of the court to satisfy itself that the writing or signature was As evidence when a dispute arose. The fact that one of the methods of proving such a handwriting or signature was presented to a handwriting expert by a court of reference, however, was to compare the controversial handwriting or signature with the acknowledged signature and Then there was the option of reaching your own inquiries when the parties did not call a specialist. In order to give an opinion on the truth of the signature, the trial court must make its own opinion by comparing it with the signed signature of the contentious signature, Article 84 of the Law Evidence, 1984, provided that the signature of a document is confessional or oral Evidence can be proved by this. Such fact can also be substantiated by referring to witnesses who had previously signed, admissions and controversial signatures, compared with a handwriting expert by the executive or by the court or other circumstances. To do jobs for advocates from Makran lawyer