Find a Lawyer

SHABBIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2 302/34 of Definition of Evidence The case was immediately filed and the prosecutor successfully proved that the motive against the accused could not be established by Alibi's plea and presented by himself. Documents provided prove that it was he who committed the murder. The fatal injury to the victim's neck caused the death of the deceased and between the injury and between his death and post-mortem, as the doctor did the post-mortem, the prosecution said at the time of the FIR. In addition to the light of the electric pole on which the accused had objected, the adjoining electric light was also not on the complainant's statement in connection with the incident as the complaint was at that time. The victim was with the deceased, witnesses with the deceased or the complainant, there was no standard for excluding their evidence unless they had evidence. The JC was tainted with hostility The record of any nature of the accused witnesses could not be brought to bear with him, even though the prosecution's witnesses were given a lengthy scrutiny examination, but on the identification of the accused, the pistol was recovered from the crime. There was no match, the defense had no use because it was not necessary that the accused had produced the pistol from which he fired. Evidence on the record proved that he committed the murder of the prosecution. The accused, sentenced and sentenced by the trial court against them, was retained, the co-accused was retained, the accused's brother had no motive and hence he will be implicated. family advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer