Find a Lawyer

NASIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

The definition of the evidence in section 2 (b (b)) was not mentioned in the brief facts of the inquiry report prepared by the investigating officer. The error showed that the FIR was considered for consideration and consultation. Later, when the FLR was enrolled in the Inquiry Report, the number of FIRs must have been stated in the above report. It is reported that six bullets were fired on the victim, which was applied to various parts of his body, but according to the post-mortem report, three entrances from the firearm Wounds were found, one with exit and three with shoulder arms. If the witnesses were present on the spot, they would not have made such a mistake. The complainant himself admitted that his family had different reasons for politics. There was enmity with the people. And the police, along with the complainant, was the real brother of the victim and both witnesses were real brothers, no independent witnesses were presented. Not available The complainant stated before the trial court that someone other than himself and his brother had been arrested. There was not, but my brother who was a prosecution witness. It was reported that there were 10/15 people who made statements to the investigating officer about the incident, but none of them were cited or prosecutors' records indicate that the victim's family There was a drug peddler in which no crime was recovered. Occasionally, the weapons expert merely reported that the suspect was intoxicated. law firms from Babri Banda lawyer