Find a Lawyer

BHUTTO versus THE STATE

Validating Article 302/148/149 The evidence of the prosecution's two witnesses was unbelievable and untrustworthy because their statements were recorded after more than a month without providing any explanation as to why they were so long. Being silent said that the authenticity of the defect has been affected. Witnesses said their evidence should be denied. It said that statements of other prosecution witnesses were denied regarding their relationship with other prosecution witnesses and their statements were found to have material contradictions. If the statements of the two witnesses were extracted, it is worth considering that the accused. There was no evidence linking the commission to the crime, the prosecution failed to prove the accused against any reasonable suspicion, the trial court sentenced the accused and the accused were acquitted. Was done. top civil advocates from Jauharabad lawyer