Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KHAN MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE


Section 2302/5 365A / Anti 34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D Law in Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 91 Definition of Evidence All Case The judicial confession was based on guilt. Through the support and other pieces of evidence that the accused had proven to be true and voluntary, the magistrate complied with all the requirements of the law that were required to be taken to record the judicial confession, according to the confessional statements of the accused. According to the law that was recorded, they should be considered as genuine documents, meaning the Article of the law un-evidence, alleged 1984 confessional statements of the accused persons showed that the accused shot everyone. Was hit by what he suffered and died on the spot. The medical evidence was fully verified and verified by the revolver, and the empty pills recovered from the suspects were sent to the chemical analyst for a test report of the chemical analyst who revealed that the bullet from the revolver taken from the suspect's possession. Was run, it was alleged that the investigation had already been completed before the FIR was filed, not the case of the prosecution. Before the actual FIR was filed by the police, a credible inquiry was made so that the sub-inspector could ascertain the accuracy of the information received by the police and in most such cases most of the FIRs recorded prior to the preliminary inquiry were called irrefutable evidence. But this irregularity was not enough to exclude the prosecution itself because the false prosecution proved its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the accused said.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Timergara lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.