Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR ALI versus THE STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860) Sections 302/324 Crimes Against Property, (Enforcement Ordinance) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (4) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Bail, Injury Approval of the statement, which was recorded more than two months after the incident, was the only witness recorded in the case and it was said that witnesses had disclosed the facts to another prosecution witness three days after the incident and police The testimony of the witnesses was not recorded so the fact of the matter was doubted. The witness's investigating officer's statements knew that the injured was admitted to the hospital in a state of unconsciousness and that he did not know how the incident occurred and whose investigation officer could not obtain information from the incident. Has filed an FIR against the investigating officer of the unknown accused himself. The hospital was bound to track the condition of the wounds so that it obtained information about the incident and the names of the perpetrators. The Rome hospital did not go to the police station for recording its statement, saying there was no case of delay in recording the statement under Section 161, CRPC, which apparently affected the prosecution's case, though That time was to be crushed. At trial, but in the case of the prosecution, a suspicion was raised that an unequivocal and unreported explanation of the delay in recording witness statements would affect the truthfulness of such witnesses' statements and dismiss them deliberately. Needs to be done because there were reasonable grounds to believe that the accused was entitled to a discount on bail, best advocate from Kallat lawyer