Find a Lawyer

KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED versus HAJI HASHIM HAJI AHMED BROTHERS

Sections 44C and 26 (6) of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the declaration of Articles 42 and 56 and the permanent injunction against the supplementary electricity bill result in the recovery and disconnection of the power supply in the trial court. With relief, after recording the evidence it was concluded that the case was stopped under Section 454C of the Electricity Act, 1910 and sections 42 and 56 of the Special Relief Act 1877, but to settle the accounts. Partially pronounced the case and referred the matter to an electric inspector. Was the authority authorized under section 26 (6) of the Electricity Act, 1910, to have the electric inspector dispose of his findings and submit a report to the trial court, which, despite the objection of the appellant, the court Accepted, and the same appellate court's trial court upheld the decision after holding that it had no jurisdiction and that the dispute was rightly referred to E. ? The lecturer inspector had to leave the parties to fight the case for a dispute and the appropriate court decision before the classification provided under the Electricity Act, 1910, but the trial court separated its jurisdiction. The other officers entered the sphere and stopped the matter. Judging by the Appellate Forum's report and the objections filed against it as Electric Inspector, it concluded that the error was repeated by the appellate court, under which both the courts approved. lawer from fb area from Utror lawyer