Sections 2302 and 7377 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 (2A) appeal against a misdemeanor, the benefit of the suspect is the complainant / grandfather of the deceased minor boy who was last seen as a witness. Claimed that, in his presence, the facts of the meeting with the accused were disclosed about the facts, which had improved his statement, his last scene, the cooked and fabricated story. And the capital charge could not be punished even on the evidence of the last seen statement. The complainant did not receive any support from the alleged confessional statement of the accused, and the last time the story was prepared after the arrest of the accused, the confessional statement of the accused was filed after 4 days' physical remand of the accused who was the accused's commissioner. , Was an element of violence. And the threats by the police during his physical remand, consideration could not be excluded. The confessional statement of the accused could not be helped; port of medical evidence; and this story was presented in the confessional statement of the accused. Did not appeal that the confession of the accused was a confession of guilt, which is neither proved by any circumstantial evidence nor by medical evidence, nor could the voluntary judicial confession be called nor charged. There was not even a word about the shoes of the allegedly recovered man, which is not in accordance with the law. The identity parade made in this case could not be charged for the shoe / chapel recovery because the accused sodomy. There was no sign of the alleged violence by the accused. Internal and external examination of the body, and all of death
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
