Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD INAM versus AMANULLAH

Section 13 Students' performance of witness statements was consistent with the Post Office's Plaintiff Record Keeper's statement that the student's publication was presented to the Patwari Circle to prove receipt for sending notices to prove that the plaintiff participant. Is the owner and has the right Subsequently, the plaintiff's plaintiff was exhibited in the presence of the plaintiff and the witnesses there, when she was informed that the slightest contradiction or misleading in the statements of the witnesses could not be made in the case of the plaintiff. Was established and the law was not in favor of it being thrown out merely on the basis of technicality. The courts had misinterpreted section 13 (3) of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Emission Act 1987, and the law was revised, and the case was dismissed. Directed to submit market value within 40 days

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• ZUBAIR SHARIF v. The STATE 2015 YLR 2022
• Haji AKBAR KHAN v. WAJID ZAHOOR 2015 YLR 2039
• NOOR SHAH GUL v. ASIM ULLAH 2015 PLD 1
• Mst. SAIMA GUL v. HAIDER ZAMAN 2015 PLD 14
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. State 2015 PLD 23
• ZAKARIYA KHAN v. UNITED BANK OF PAKISTAN 2015 PLC 23
• ASHRAF KHAN v. ZAFFAR IQBAL 2015 YLR 27
• Mst. BASWARA v. HAFIZULLAH KHAN 2015 PLD 30

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

best law firm from Kamra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes