TAHIR NADEEM versus THE STATE
The Arts 3/4 Control of the Narcotic Material Stances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c), was not recovered from the possession of the alleged drug addicts as defined in the evidence because, according to the investigating officer, the accused was black on a black shopper. The painter, throwing away, was an intoxicant and was not arrested on the spot. Prosecutors testified that it was dark at the time of the alleged incident and when he fled the scene, the policeman who raided the scene. The member had stated that he did not know the identity of the accused personally, in which case the question of the identity of the accused, in the circumstances, Be not above a reality, the accused will be acquitted him alone while giving benefit of the doubt, the prosecution had failed. The defendant was convicted and sentenced by the trial to prove his case against the accused in the trial. Take advantage of these charges
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Hayatabad lawyer
