Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL ALIAS BALA versus THE STATE

Arts 3/4 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 340 (2), 342 and 439 Appeal to the trial court to seal and send the parcel of heroin to the date when the accused was settled for final argument. Is. The Chemical Examiner for analysis and his report also requested the accused to allow time for making an oath statement under Section 340 (2); the CCP's request was denied by the trial court; The parcel of heroin and the corresponding sample sent to the expert for review against the review and the report was denied by the trial court due to the fact that the evidence of the prosecution in this case was concluded. And that it was not registered for examination under Section 342, CRPC. Not only did he refuse to present any evidence in his defense, but he also refused to take an oath under section 340 (2), the CRPC charged itself with the commencement of the trial. What was Under Section 2, Cr, CRPC, his test made no such request that he could easily do so if he really intended it, in the most alien stage when the case was settled for final arguments. If such an attempt was made by the accused, it might have been considered a request to allow the CCP to file a statement under oath under Section 404040 (?) of the accused to extend the trial's conclusion. Dismissed rightly, because when the accused was examined under CRPC 34, 342, he denied that the law required a method for an act. The car was fixed and did not allow a stage for the same suspect best advocate from Orakzai lawyer