MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus AMJAD HUSSAIN
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 324/337/148/149 bail, nothing was brought on the cancellation record to show that the accused had misused the privilege of bail. The bail could not be retained before the High Court under the subsequent inquiry, which sought to cancel the bail on the basis of subsequent searches. In view of the law reported as SCMR 479 of 1979, it is not possible to conclude that the accused will be subject to the maximum punishment; the accused will be entitled to use his discretion and As the trial court could not grant bail to the accused who did not use the misconduct, the bail application was rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kallat lawyer