Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus AMJAD HUSSAIN


Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 324/337/148/149 bail, nothing was brought on the cancellation record to show that the accused had misused the privilege of bail. The bail could not be retained before the High Court under the subsequent inquiry, which sought to cancel the bail on the basis of subsequent searches. In view of the law reported as SCMR 479 of 1979, it is not possible to conclude that the accused will be subject to the maximum punishment; the accused will be entitled to use his discretion and As the trial court could not grant bail to the accused who did not use the misconduct, the bail application was rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Kallat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.