Find a Lawyer

JAHANGIR versus THE STATE

The testimony of section 2302 (b) of the evidence was that of the sole accused named in the instant-filed FIR, the complainant was the deceased's real brother and the second witness of the prosecution was the husband of both his sister and the inmate. Was a natural witness and explained her presence fully. On the occasion, the witnesses were true witnesses and no material contradiction was identified in their testimony. There was no denying the time, time and place of the incident that it was taken by the accused that he had taken the grave. Under the assassination and was the result of sudden outrage that was not charged. Approve that he saw the deceased (his wife) in a position to allegedly compromise with someone and that no such suggestion was given to the prosecution's witnesses, the accused also told the high police officials against the investigating officer. Did not complain, if he was not satisfied with the investigation, the Ocular Account was fully authenticated through the recovery of medical evidence and blood stains. On the occasion of the prosecution of the accused, in circumstances, beyond the shadow of doubt. The trial court had already set its case against the accused completely. Was optional, was to maintain the same sentence criminals. immigration advocates phone number from Kot Mithan lawyer