SHAHID versus THE STATE
The forensic science laboratory evidence report on firearms recovered from Sections (a) and c (c) was positive, but was sent to the firearms specialist after the crime was recovered, however He later recovered the weapons. Do not provide so much power in the prosecution's case that two witnesses identified the accused as eye witnesses had no enmity with the accused so that they could be falsely included in the murder case. Ocular evidence was credible in those circumstances the sentence of the accused was retained But as a precautionary measure, the other three defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment so that there could be no injustice because any human error by prosecution witnesses appealed against it. Was deleted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Islamabad lawyer