Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAZIR versus MST. KHADIJA BIBI

A lawsuit was filed for the specific performance of the Section 12 sale agreement in which it was claimed that the plaintiff had, through her lawyer, executed the sale agreement in favor of the plaintiffs in the case of land. Had received enough money and the claimant refused to enforce the sale agreement. And the trial of the plaintiffs' trial was filed by the court, but it was affirmed by the appellate court. The alleged settlement agreement was not proven in accordance with the law because it stated that the documents were neither mentioned nor attached to the plaintiff nor relied upon by the plaintiff. Earlier, the lawsuit was filed for a permanent injunction, but said it was never mentioned in the document, it was said that there was little evidence of the document being used by the defendants without any good reason. Was not inspected, the alleged contract of sale was and was not registered with the sub-registrar, without restriction. The professionally licensed process was attributed to a re-accused lawyer involved in any of Sigaton's registrations when compared to the attorney's signature on the General Power of Attorney, which the racially handwriting expert did not even suspend. The signature of the lawyer's lawyer was not in his handwriting which there was no evidence to prove that in the year, month, day, time and place, the alleged contract of sale was negotiated between the parties. The receipt of the money by the defendant could not be proved, in the circumstances, the defendant filed the suit filed by the plaintiffs properly. Exhaust top civil advocates from Jhal Magsi lawyer