MUHAMMAD JAMEEL versus THE STATE
No further inquiry into the section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), bail, FIR was named for the accused, but the additional statements filed on the same day were based on the suspect. But he was involved in it. The relevant police station's Department HA mentioned in its case diary that the complaining party could not produce any evidence or evidence against the accused. No recovery from the accused had been effected. All such factors proceed to the accused's case. Have increased. An inquiry that attracted section (2) of section 497, the CRPC accused who had been behind bars after his arrest, had a bail-out, a former non-criminal case of extension of the accused's bail. Was gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Peshawar lawyer
