Find a Lawyer

JAMIL AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD

Sections 1, 2 (k) and 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant The tenant was summoned to the landlord in his personal need premises which was approved by the rent controller and the appellate court. Number confirmed The notification under Sections 1 and 2 (k) of the Ordinance was issued by the Federal Government and published in the Official Gazette, declaring the relevant area as "urban area", the Islamabad Rent Ban Ordinance, 2001. The petitioner's position was argued for. / The tenant was that in the absence of full notification of the proceedings before the lower courts were without legal authority, the opinion of the landlord was that the tenant / applicants submitted to the controller of the rent controller. And the appellate authority would refrain from challenging the tenant's jurisdiction over the aforementioned tribunals even though he failed to raise a jury objection. Accuse him of rent controller as well as before the appellate court but he will not refuse to explain the law by the landlord himself and why he has previously approached a wrong forum. That the landlords had begun the process by seeking their jurisdiction. Under Section 17 of the Ordinance, the entire procedure of the landlord, after filing an eviction application before the rent controller and the Special Tribunal, was bound to justify the proceedings before the court / tribunal, There was a lack of jurisdiction. On the basis that the tenant inquired into Esteple's ordinance famous lower court advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer