Find a Lawyer

NADEEM SADIQ DOGAR versus T.M.O.

Article 67 Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, RR 37, 39 and 41 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal for the Chairman, Monitoring Committee Applicants and the Respondent in the Election Results, Chairman of the Office of the Monitoring Committee Were. The Returning Officer announced that each of them received 60 votes and the Returning Officer therefore decided to stop the Toss Draw in favor of the petitioner, but the Tas was repeated for the second and third time in which the Respondent succeeded. Declared. Before the dismissal of the Chief Officer by the Returning Officer and the declaration of the defendant before finally succeeding, the representation made by the applicant alleged that in fact he got 61 votes while the defendant got 59 votes, But in order to gain the support of the chairman group, the two-ballot applicant was allegedly mistaken and excluded from the count and that the first toss fell to her mother, but the relevant rules. In violation, the defendant co-recorded the presence of the parties for the second and third time to ensure the victory of the coin. Vilna it shows that a ballot despite Stamp voters column applicants. The rejection was rejected by the officer and the other was rejected by the appellate authority for no good and valid reason, while considering the number of legitimate votes of the contesting parties, it was clear that the applicant had applied. Votes got more votes than those who got more votes. Unlawful voting over respondents Pakistan, top advocate family court from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer