MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus HAFEEZ AHMAD
Section 171717 Appellate Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 The appeal against the defendant's verdict was that at the time the victim had a gun in his hand and that he was beating the accused with the butt of the gun mentioned above and the gun while being beaten. Broke out The victim, who died of his own aggression and died, was supported by this version of the suspect, the two most senior investigating officers, and there was no reason to show that police officers were unnecessarily deported in favor of the accused. What was intended as a prosecution was not proven and this fact backed up the fact of the prosecutor's story. Medical evidence also supported the defendant's version and denied the prosecution's version of the evidence. None of the articles from this event were articles. Either the weapon of crime was recovered. Prosecuting witnesses support the killing of the accused by firing on the victim, it was also proved beyond any doubt that the trial court rightly acquitted Tennis of the suspect, based on the record. The trial court's reasonable decision on the appeal cannot be interrupted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Musakhel lawyer