ALLAH DITTA versus THE STATE
Under section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 354 and 354A bail, the grant of the accused named in the FIR, allegedly by his co-accused, made the wife of the accused's common complainant and in this case It was exposed to public view. It did provide some explanation for the delay in filing the FIR, but it was a question of reasonableness or otherwise a deep appreciation of the evidence that would have guaranteed the victim's statement under Section 161, CRPC. Neither valid nor desirable at this stage. Almost always was consistent with the FIR and on the basis of this alone the accused was associated with the alleged crime when the defendant was accused of tampering with the evidence of litigation to obtain the oaths of some witnesses. Was an indication of the effort being made. Disgusting in nature, but also covered under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), the PCP bail application was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Chilas lawyer
