Find a Lawyer

COOPERATIVE MODEL TOWN SOCIETY (1962) LTD., MODEL TOWN, LAHORE versus SECRETARY, COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE

Article 54 and Constitution 64 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Appeal against the decision of the Senior District Cooperative Officer to the extent, in the petition filed by the respondent under section 54, Cooperative Society Act 1925 Subsequently, the cooperative officer, who had declared the senior district safe, claimed that the parties were informed by his office on the telephone on 11-9 2001 that the decision of the petition would be announced to the applicant cooperative society on 139 2001. Representatives did not receive any notification from the Senior District Cooperative Officer Pune visited the office. 16 1 In 2002, after receiving a notification that the decision was made on 139 2001, to inquire whether the decision had been reached by them, the applicant cooperative society received a certified copy of the order. Appeal filed with Secretary, Cooperative Department within two months. , But the same was rejected in the office notice of the accuracy of the Senior District Cooperative Officer who did not disclose the person who allegedly received the telephonic message 1111 2001 as claimed by the Senior District Cooperative Office. Announced the improper order passed on 139 2001. It has been shown that the applicant society was not disposed of, as alleged communication by telephone does not fall within the parameters of section 64 of the Co-operative Society Act 1925, as word communication means a written letter to the applicant. Not reported by the applicant on the telephone, within two months from the learned economics / alleged communication society Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer