REHMAT ALI versus MUHAMMAD SAIF ULLAH
Section 15 law states that as witness in Article 114 suit for the termination of this testimony (10 of 1984), Estoppel Wendy stated that in the presence of two other persons, he informed the servant about the purchase of suit land, but He did not examine these people. The two men did not name the witnesses in their statement, which they held in court, examined it, made such request in the written statement and the vendor's evidence, if read together and deemed it correct. If taken, the law could not speak of the estoppel according to Shariah.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Karore Lalisan lawyer
