Find a Lawyer

AYESHA BIBI versus ILAM DIN

Article 46 (5) West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Article 45 (1973) of Pakistan Constitution, Article 185 (3) Evidence of marriage Deviation of inheritance The final facts of the fact of the matter which are given below to the plaintiffs. Courts accept responsibility for inheritance change On the basis that he was also the son of the widow and the deceased owner of the suit land, the trial court dismissed the case, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the trial court upheld the decision by the High Court in the jurisdiction. Upheld and the appellate court's valid amendment decision upheld, the court agreed with the appellate court's findings, saying that the defendants, through their statements, successfully proved their relationship with the deceased landowner and testified. Through his evidence presented by a witness, the plaintiff was a widow's real brother whose special status The information in relation to the question in question and it satisfied the requirements of the Convention evidence, 1 High4 The High Court rightly found that the witnesses presented by the defendants had nothing to do with the parties. And so they had no specific information about the relationship in question, which the harmony of the appellate court and the reviewing court showed that it could not be shown to be crooked or that there was any misunderstanding or misreading available on the record. As a result, such disclosures were deemed unconvincing and the appeal was denied. lawer from fb area from Dhatmal lawyer